• No products in the basket.
cart chevron-down close-disc
  • Arts & Culture
  • Issue 43

Bad Idea:

What happens when researchers go fishing. Words by Precious Adesina. Photograph by Lamberto Teotino.

“P-hacking” sounds like some sort of dark-web-cryptocurrency-type activity. But, in fact, it’s a shady practice from a different sphere: the pseudoscientific manipulation of a study to produce a desirable result. Coined by psychologists Uri Simonsohn, Joseph Simmons and Leif Nelson almost a decade ago, the “p” comes from “p-value,” a number given to research to show how likely the results could have come about by chance. 

A value lower than 0.05 (5%) allows researchers to declare their findings as “statistically significant, ” thus considerably increasing the likelihood of their work being published. Rather than setting out to prove a hypothesis, p-hacking means looking at the data and working backward to find out what hypothesis it could possibly prove.1 If a researcher is disappointed by the lack of findings from a particular study (on the benefit of eating breakfast for weight loss, for instance), they might


This story is from Kinfolk Issue Forty-Three

Buy Now

This story appears in a print issue of Kinfolk. You’re welcome to read this story for free or subscribe to enjoy unlimited access.


Kinfolk.com uses cookies to personalize and deliver appropriate content, analyze website traffic and display advertising. Visit our cookie policy to learn more. By clicking "Accept" you agree to our terms and may continue to use Kinfolk.com.