
Trompe l'Oeil with a Bust of Venus, 1665. Courtesy of Mauritshuis, The Hague
Reformed Characters Should adaptations read between the lines?
Reformed Characters Should adaptations read between the lines?
In Casino Royale, James Bond orders a vodka martini, and is asked, “shaken or stirred?” “Do I look like I give a damn?” he spits back tersely—a clever, if facile, way of signaling that the character had moved on since his early days of fussy tux-wearing and silly gadgetry. Daniel Craig’s 007, we gathered, was to be more of a bruised everyman than the perma-coiffed spy played by his predecessor, Pierce Brosnan. This delighted fans of the franchise, but raised questions about how far from their roots a character could stray.
This past winter, Greta Gerwig tested the limits of this idea with a free-flowing adaptation of Little Women, which essentially rewrote the relationship between Jo and Laurie, and which gave us a wholly new Amy, as played by Florence Pugh. Amy had always b...


